Further collaboration between administrative regulation and judicial trial
最高院《意见》仅从顶层设计了行政管理与行政规制，法院、检察院等司法机构的审判制度尚不完善。再者，行刑衔接也需进一步完善，如落实双碳目标的刑事合规不起诉制度，在把握行政监管与司法裁判的界限划分前提下，应从重行政规制转变到行政与司法统一协调，妥善处理行政法、民法适用的交叉问题。
The Opinions of the Supreme Court only design the administrative management and administrative regulation from the top level, and the trial system of courts, procuratorates and other judicial institutions is not yet perfected. Furthermore, the linkage between the execution and punishment also needs to be improved. For example, a system of non-prosecution for criminal compliance with the dual-carbon objective is to be implemented. Under the premise of grasping the demarcation of the boundaries between administrative supervision and judicial adjudication, it should shift from focusing on administrative regulation to the unification and coordination of administration and justice, and properly deal with the cross-cutting issues of the application of administrative law and civil law.
在司法审判中应确立集中管辖法院。最高院发布《环境资源案件类型与统计规范（试行）》厘清了环境资源审判中的
碳市场交易纠纷的受案范围，但并未明确环境资源案件具体由哪个业务部门审理，分为集中管辖法院审理和非集中管辖法院审理，应明确集中管辖，确保裁判尺度统一。
Centralized jurisdiction courts should be established in judicial trials. The Supreme Court issued the "Environmental Resources Case Types and Statistical Specifications (for Trial Implementation)" to clarify the scope of the carbon market transaction disputes in the environmental resources trial, but it did not specify the specific environmental resources cases by which business sector, divided into centralized jurisdiction courts and non-centralized jurisdiction courts, should be clearly centralized jurisdiction, to ensure that the judgment scale is uniform.
版权申明：本内容来自于互联网，属第三方汇集推荐平台。本文的版权归原作者所有，文章言论不代表链门户的观点，链门户不承担任何法律责任。如有侵权请联系QQ：3341927519进行反馈。
